Met yuh no wah see how much case shushana have pending! Then met how this miss wi?!! She an smady pudung big fight it look like cuz look pon the charges! One more felony pon har to rass! No sah!!
Met yuh no wah see how much case shushana have pending! Then met how this miss wi?!! She an smady pudung big fight it look like cuz look pon the charges! One more felony pon har to rass! No sah!!
Such a waste of life ‘ no ambition & call her self a mother . She has no family morals or family value she’s better of in jail.
To. Clattttttttttttt fi smaddy Weh illegal and gah jail Suh much time wid how much misdemeanor And felony plus pending how she don’t gone home as yet?
No sa then them ppl a hater fi them things if I had live so just fi hype I’m glad I love d simple life
Shush Anna yu better tan tuddy hold a job or go get a skill,. Not shoplifting things you can do in the light, not things of the dark,or go dung ah Houston go work pon di garbage truck side ah kirk…stay the f**k out dem people jail cell…is wah really duh unnuh..is poverty really eating at unnuh soul so bad that it’s making yu a angry crabbitt monsters in the street. When will be the day unnuh get some congrats, instead good fi har she fi get dip,she tink she too bad….. lawkkkks man sick stomach
She is a waste ..send har back a ja and send someone that wants to make the best of their life… pathetic
But shushanna and baldhead unno obeah man really strong tho cause none a unno have papers and stay getting locked up on some real shit an still a walk road,mmmmm.cause mi see man do less and get dip..how unno suh special a wah suh…maybe dem a work wid the feds..
SHE CUM OUT 9/2 AND GET REARRESTED 9/3 FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION… SO IF SHE A WUK SHE NAH DO A GUD JOB CUZ A IN DEH SHE DEH RIGHT NOW…
Inmate Details
BLAKE, SHUSHANNA
NYSID: 08403600R
Year of Birth: 1979
Sex: Female
Race: Black
Height: 5 ft 10 inches
Weight: 145 lbs
Hair Color: Brown
Eye Color: Brown
Nativity: United States
Booking Information Incarceration 03-SEP-2015
Book & Case Number: 6001500515
Current Housing Facility: RMSC (Rose M. Singer Center)
Arrest Date: 03-SEP-2015
Warrants
Warrant # Type Charge Severity
00679676 New York State Department of Parole VOP ( VOP ) Z
00121872 New York State Department of Parole VOP ( VOP ) Z
Inmates released over 30 days ago will not be displayed.
” the lady weh she go a Long Island … Mek sure sey even if she go in she ago come out ” lmao #theladywiththefowl
Criminal/Motor Vehicle Conviction Case Detail
Information is accurate as of September 04, 2015 06:18 AM
Defendant Information
Last, First:
BLAKE SHUSHANNA
Represented By:
427579 SN BROWN
Birth Year:
1979
Docket Information
Docket No:
S01S-CR08-0164366-S
Original Arresting Agency:
LOCAL POLICE GREENWICH
Court:
Stamford GA 1
Costs:
Original Arrest Date:
8/23/2008
Sentenced Date:
2/23/2011
Overall Sentence Information
Committed to Department of Corrections
Statute Description Class Type Occ Offense Date Plea Verdict Finding Verdict Date Fine Fee(s)
53a-123
Larceny 2nd Deg
C Felony 1 8/23/2008 Guilty Guilty 2/23/2011 $0.00 $0.00
Sentenced: 3 Years Jail, Special Parole 6 Years
53a-172
Failure To Appear 1st Deg
D Felony 1 4/23/2010 Guilty Guilty 2/23/2011 $0.00 $0.00
Sentenced: 3 Years Jail
Friday,
September 04, 2015
Docket Search
by Court Location
Friday,
September 04, 2015
Docket Search
by Defendant
Pending Cases
Search by Defendant
Pending Cases
Search by Docket Number
Convictions Search
by Defendant
Convictions Search
by Docket Number
Attorney/Firm Case List
Attorney/Firm Look-up
Numbers
GA Court Phone
Numbers
JD Court Phone
Numbers
Home
Criminal/Motor Vehicle Conviction Case Detail
Information is accurate as of September 04, 2015 06:18 AM
Defendant Information
Last, First:
BLAKE SHUSHANNA KEISHA
Represented By:
427579 SN BROWN
Birth Year:
1979
Docket Information
Docket No:
S01S-CR06-0155871-S
Original Arresting Agency:
LOCAL POLICE GREENWICH
Court:
Stamford GA 1
Costs:
Original Arrest Date:
5/29/2006
Sentenced Date:
2/23/2011
Overall Sentence Information
Committed to Department of Corrections
Statute Description Class Type Occ Offense Date Plea Verdict Finding Verdict Date Fine Fee(s)
53a-125b
Larceny 6Th Deg
C Misdemeanor 1 5/29/2006 Guilty Guilty 4/28/2010 $0.00 $0.00
Sentenced: 90 Days Jail
53a-173
Failure To Appear 2nd Deg
A Misdemeanor 1 5/29/2006 Guilty Guilty 4/23/2010 $0.00 $0.00
Sentenced: 1 Year Jail
BLAKE, SHUSHANNA
NYSID: 08403600R
Year of Birth: 1979
Sex: Female
Race: Black
Height: 5 ft 10 inches
Weight: 145 lbs
Hair Color: Brown
Eye Color: Brown
Nativity: United States
Booking Information Incarceration 03-SEP-2015
Book & Case Number: 6001500515
Current Housing Facility: RMSC (Rose M. Singer Center)
Arrest Date: 03-SEP-2015
Warrants
Warrant # Type Charge Severity
00679676 New York State Department of Parole VOP ( VOP ) Z
00121872 New York State Department of Parole VOP ( VOP ) Z
Shushanna was arrested again yesterday she went to. Court after bieng on bail and she was arrested at court again so she currently at rikers island awaiting parole court.
What a gal stupid. From i was born one gal can fool fool so. A what dem really tek the justice system for this bird brain gal. Before she stay home with her pickney follow kerryann gone fight to prove to white plains road logger head that she bad well
What was her initial arrest for??? Can’t be that she went with my EBT Mami to fight…..Kerry ah walk road while your 8 month old daughter is left again!!
EBT mami fi get duck wid a bucket a piss, peppa n caca and then get beat wid de bucket. Those are hoes that ain’t loyal. Dem know de gal salt and have young pickney, yet dem have har inna dem war with a girl way below dem age.
De shushana gal fi hol a sentence and a deport since she can’t tek telling. Jamaica ideal fi the type a life and beating she a look and who fi tell it may improve her outlook on life.
All of dis carelessness from a Mother who is 36 y/o?!?!?!? Mek dis be from ah 16 y/o who nuh know demself yet or even as far as a 26 y/o weh might be JUSS start know demself but ah big ole 36 YEAR OLD?!?!? No sahhh, mi shame & anno me!
And alla dis bigging up like dem have dis & have dat & you ah use ah Legal Aid attorney??? No proper criminal attorney on retainer?!?!? Weh dem fi BC know & do DEM NUH KNOW & DO!!!
Is this person on drugs????????? What is to become of her children?????? How selfish can you really be?????? Wow!!!!!!!!!
@brooklyn cutie pie. Well said my dear
These celine bags owners. Have to use Legal Aid lawyer. Poor wanted to be rich soul dem. them need to send these duty bungles all home. What a set a crosses dem a guess she loyal to her matey kerryann. Lol. She go fight. She lucky she never get kill. Dumbbitch When this dunce bat gonna learn common sense
Mi kno people weh pick up 1 charge an get deport a cudda wah shi a tell dem suh make she get sumuch chance? Wi need fi know fi har lawya loll
as i saw the info mi haffi a say all that designer brand and haffi a use legal aid? talk about priorities.
Word on the street shushanna is also a informer
They say a she gi way jue icon. Introduce him to the police and she is also working. Oh well. These duty bungles. One to all sick stomach. What a bunch
[*1] People v Blake 2008 NY Slip Op 51880(U) [20 Misc 3d 1145(A)] Decided on September 15, 2008 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, New York County Douglas, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on September 15, 2008
Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff,
against
Shushanna Blake, Defendant.
2007NY089171
The People were represented by:
Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney
(Julia London, Assistant District Attorney)
New York County District Attorney’s Office
One Hogan Place
New York, NY 10013
The defendant was represented by:
Robert T. Perry
350 Broadway, Suite 1207
New York, NY 10013
Dena E. Douglas, J.
Defendant Shushanna Blake has moved to dismiss all charges in the above action pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 30.30 on the grounds that the People have exceeded the applicable time limitations for trial readiness pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 30.30. Defendant is charged with petit larceny (PL 155.25) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (PL 165.40). Petit larceny is a Class A misdemeanor and the People therefore have 90 days in which to declare ready for trial.
Defendant was arraigned on November 28, 2007 and her counsel filed the instant 30.30 motion on July 7, 2008, after the passage of 222 days. In the case of a motion made pursuant to CPL § 30.30, a defendant meets her burden of going forward by showing that a delay greater than the allowable statutory limit has occurred since the commencement of the action. Once shown, the burden then shifts to the People to show that certain periods of time should not be charged against them (see People v Berkowitz, 50 NY2d 333 [1980]).
After the People have announced their readiness for trial, the burden rests upon the People to clarify, on the record, the basis for an adjournment, so that on a subsequent speedy trial [*2]motion, the Court can determine to whom the adjournment should be charged (see People v Cortes, 80 NY2d 201, 215-216 [1992]; People v Liotta, 79 NY2d 841, 843 [1992]). After the People have initially declared their readiness for trial, they may request a limited adjournment thereafter and be charged only for the actual period of time requested. (People v Urraea, 214 AD2d 378[1995]).
At arraignment the defendant waived motions and the matter was adjourned for trial on February 7, 2008. The parties agree that the People first declared their readiness for trial on December 11, 2007, by filing a certificate of readiness with the court and communicating that readiness by mail to the defendant. (People v Kendzia, 64 NY2d 331 [1985]), and that the 13 days between November 28th and December 11th are chargeable to the People. (13 days)
On February 7th the People were not ready for trial and the matter was adjourned to April 16, 2008 for trial. The People filed another certificate of readiness on February 15, 2008. The defendant contends that this certificate of readiness was ineffective because the People did not request a limited adjournment or adjournment to a specific date, citing People v Reid, 214 AD2d 396 (First Department, 1995). This court disagrees with defendant’s argument.
In People v. Reid, the Appellate Division, First Department held that when the People caused post-readiness delay, the filing of a statement of readiness before the next adjourned date would be “too late to alter the adjournment already granted, or responsibility for the delay necessitated thereby.” Id. at 397. In People v Stirrup, however (91 NY2d 434 [1998]), the Court of Appeals rejected the Reid rule, holding that a notice of readiness is the kind of record commitment to proceed which satisfies the People’s duty to be ready for trial, and serves to toll the speedy trial clock’ from running for the remainder of the adjournment period.” (Id. at 439-40.) Both the Appellate Term and the Appellate Division, First Department have held, however, that the Stirrup rule does not apply when the People have requested an adjournment of a particular length. See People v Rodriguez, 12 Misc 3d 132A (Appellate Term, First Dept, 2006) and People v Anderson (252 AD2d 399, 401 [First Dept, 1998]. In both Reid and Stirrup, as in this matter, the People had not requested an adjournment of any particular length before filing the statement of readiness. The Stirrup rule, therefore, applies here, and the People are charged with the 8 days of delay between February 7th and February 15, 2008. (8 days)
The parties agreed that in each of the two subsequent adjournment periods, where the People requested one-week adjournments, they are responsible for the specific periods of delay that they requested: April 16th – June 10, 2008, seven (7) days; and June 10th – July 7, 2008, seven (7) days. (14 days)
Therefore, the People are charged with thirty-five (35) days of includable delay (13 + 8 + 7 +7 = 35). The People have not exceeded their statutorily available time and defendant’s motion to dismiss the matter is denied.
This opinion constitutes the decision and order of the court.
Dated:New York, New York____________________
Sept 15, 2008Dena E. Douglas
Judge of the Civil Court
Which sushanna is this pictures please
If she is NOT ill then I am…
And neither mi nor u nuh sick…She must be cursed …dis nuh normal
If she is not an informer she is done she will not return this time, vop and this is a felony violation she will have to go back to prison and finish the rest of her parole and deal with this new case, she is just a mother statement of ghetto rich, and the ones what call them selves rich y r u affiliated, with a thieft like this so, that’s how we kno none of y’all hood rat Thor’s have nothing. Bye thots n honey I kno u wish u were home right now
unbelievable …for someone who jus have a baby
Nativity is United States not Jamaica so how and why will she be deported?
Because she were born in jamaica and she has no legal papers and she wont behave her self in the people dem country. Instead of tek telling she walk thief make trouble look trouble with people mix up people tell vicious lie on people set up people lives put people against people that gal is something else she clearly has mental problem. A friend of her say the way she dumb just tell her someone say something she nuh find out if a true she start war with the people dem instantly. The gal war with her muma friends enemies matey stranger anybody all jump in a people fight she nuh know just through them say she like that one better and just pick side. Sometime i wonder if she tek crack mek she so stupid