Why Dexter Street Gang Case Collapsed – DPP Says ‘Exercise In Futility’ To Rely On Paper Testimony Of Missing Witness
Published:Thursday | October 24, 2019 | 1:27 AMNickoy Wilson/Gleaner Writer
Llewellyn
Llewellyn
Without the main witness, believed dead, to testify against alleged members of the Westmoreland-based Dexter Street Gang, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Paula Llewellyn has indicated that the case would not succeed.
The alleged gangsters – 15 males and four females – were charged with breaches of the Criminal Justice (Suppression of Criminal Organisations) Act 2014, commonly referred to as the Anti-Gang Legislation. However, The Gleaner understands that a number of them were remanded to answer to other criminal offences.
“He was the only witness that you really had in terms of identifying all of the men because he gave a comprehensive statement, a very good statement identifying all of the men and also serving as a party to the breaches of the various offences under the Anti-Gang Legislation,” Llewellyn said in an interview with The Gleaner yesterday.
Llewellyn said that this is why her office took the decision on Tuesday to enter a nolle prosequi, suspending the matter indefinitely, freeing the gang members when they appeared in the Home Circuit Court in downtown Kingston.
Section 31D of the Evidence Act outlines the circumstances under which a statement can be admitted into evidence in a criminal proceeding if the person who made the statement is unable to give oral evidence before the court, including if the witness is dead or mentally unfit.
The DPP said that an application in relation to that section of the act would not be successful.
“And a question could be asked, why not a Section 31D application? It would not be appropriate. In a case of this nature, credibility is a great issue … . Therefore, where the main witness is an accomplice, reliability and credibility are at the heart of the assessment that the judge – the tribunal of fact and law – is going to make of the witness. You would have to have viva voce (oral) evidence,” she said.
Llewellyn added: “So in terms of fairness [and] interest of justice, the Crown would not, could not, ethically seek to have a paper trial in terms of putting in his statement. It would not be admitted. It would be an exercise in futility because your knowledge of the case law and your experience would tell you that it would not be admitted.”
The reputed gangsters have allegedly been linked to nearly 40 murders in western Jamaica since 2016.
In 2018, The Gleaner reported that the police believed that a shipment of 19 guns intercepted at the Kingston Container Terminal on November 17, 2017, was destined for the gang.
Why wasn’t the witness protected from day one, knowing his life would be in danger from the get go. We all know his name would be released by the one or more of the lawyers for the gang members.
Why build a case of this magnitude on a single witness? Why wasn’t other gangsters offer pleads to bolster the case? When is the GOJ going to get rid of this incompetent DPP?
Simple just wipe them out one by one…A Life for a Life…A team of vigilante with means need to start taking back Jamaica.
RIDICULOUS
Jah know di system affi guh change up yow… An dem need some witness protection. Suh dem link tuh suh much murders an dus nothing suh…no man sumting have to give. ppl wee duh di wrongs an sell out fi money all when dem know it wrong… But dem aguh kill di wrong one an di whole gang guh dung.
A mi alone realise seh the people dem whe need witness protection always a avoid it?